Pain and Suffering Calculator
Estimate non-economic damages with multiplier and per diem models.
JusticeFinder Tool
Whether you sue the other driver or turn to your own coverage first depends on whether your state is no-fault, at-fault, add-on, or choice. Look up your state to see which system applies and what it means for your claim.
Select a state for the verdict in plain English, or scan the full, sortable 50-state table below.
Data under review
38 of 51 jurisdictions are fully verified. Rows still under review are listed with a caveat, but their specific deadline/rule/limit values are withheld (shown as “—”) until a final source check.
Florida
Florida is a No-fault (PIP) state. Use your own PIP first; lawsuits are limited unless you meet a threshold. Threshold to step outside no-fault: verbal (permanent injury / significant scarring).
⚠ Under review — pending a final primary-source check.
Source: Fla. OIR / Fla. Stat. § 627.736
Insurance system
—
No-fault threshold
—
All states & DC
Showing 51 of 51
| Alabama | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Arizona | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Arkansas | Add-on PIP | — | PIP is available and you can still sue the at-fault driver. |
| Californiaunder review | — | — | — |
| Colorado | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Connecticut | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Delaware | Add-on PIP | — | PIP is available and you can still sue the at-fault driver. |
| District of Columbiaunder review | — | — | — |
| Floridaunder review | — | — | — |
| Georgia | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Hawaii | No-fault (PIP) | monetary ($5k medical) / verbal | Use your own PIP first; lawsuits are limited unless you meet a threshold. |
| Idaho | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Illinois | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Indiana | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Iowa | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Kansas | No-fault (PIP) | monetary ($2k medical) | Use your own PIP first; lawsuits are limited unless you meet a threshold. |
| Kentuckyunder review | — | — | — |
| Louisiana | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Maineunder review | — | — | — |
| Maryland | Add-on PIP | — | PIP is available and you can still sue the at-fault driver. |
| Massachusettsunder review | — | — | — |
| Michiganunder review | — | — | — |
| Minnesota | No-fault (PIP) | monetary ($4k medical) / verbal | Use your own PIP first; lawsuits are limited unless you meet a threshold. |
| Mississippi | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Missouri | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Montana | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Nebraska | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Nevada | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| New Hampshireunder review | — | — | — |
| New Jerseyunder review | — | — | — |
| New Mexico | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| New York | No-fault (PIP) | verbal (serious injury) / monetary | Use your own PIP first; lawsuits are limited unless you meet a threshold. |
| North Carolinaunder review | — | — | — |
| North Dakota | No-fault (PIP) | monetary ($2.5k medical) / verbal | Use your own PIP first; lawsuits are limited unless you meet a threshold. |
| Ohio | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Oklahoma | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Oregon | Add-on PIP | — | PIP is available and you can still sue the at-fault driver. |
| Pennsylvaniaunder review | — | — | — |
| Rhode Island | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| South Carolina | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| South Dakota | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Tennessee | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Texas | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Utahunder review | — | — | — |
| Vermont | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Virginiaunder review | — | — | — |
| Washington | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| West Virginia | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Wisconsin | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
| Wyoming | At-fault (tort) | — | Sue the at-fault driver for your damages. |
Read JusticeFinder elsewhere
Short legal explainers on TikTok, visual case briefs on Instagram, daily threads on Threads — same independent editorial.
JusticeFinder Guides
Pair this calculator with the free adjuster tactics playbook and the paid claim kit to keep documentation, valuation, and negotiation aligned.
Car AccidentPremiumCar Accident Master Claim KitComplete 10-step documentation system for the first 30 days after a crash.$37View guide →
Insurance DefenseFreeInsurance Adjuster Tactics Expose + Defense PlaybookFree lead magnet exposing the 12 tactics insurers use to reduce or deny claims.FreeView guide →No-fault and at-fault states route the same crash down very different paths.
In an at-fault state you pursue the driver who caused the crash. In a no-fault state you turn to your own PIP first, and you can only step outside the system to sue if you meet the state's injury or monetary threshold. Add-on and choice states sit in between.
Knowing which system applies tells you who pays first, whether a lawsuit is even on the table yet, and what coverage you should be looking at.
Use these pages and documentation tools to validate the estimate, preserve evidence, and keep the claim file organized.
Related Tool
See the required limits and coverages alongside whether the state is no-fault or at-fault.
Related Tool
Once you know how your claim proceeds, model what a settlement nets after fees and liens.
Guides
Read the long-form guides on PIP, UM/UIM, and how no-fault claims actually work.
In a no-fault state, your own Personal Injury Protection (PIP) pays your medical and certain wage-loss costs regardless of who caused the crash, and your ability to sue is limited unless you meet a threshold.
In an at-fault state, the driver who caused the crash (through their insurer) is responsible for your damages, and you generally pursue a claim against them directly.
Add-on states offer PIP-style coverage without limiting your right to sue. Choice states let drivers select a tort or no-fault option when they buy the policy.
No-fault states set a threshold — often a serious-injury or monetary threshold — that, once met, lets you pursue a liability claim against the at-fault driver.
This tool is an educational reference only and does not constitute legal advice. No-fault rules, thresholds, and exceptions vary and change; confirm how your state's system applies with a licensed attorney or your insurer. Values shown as “under review” are not yet published.
Each calculator handles a different part of the claim lifecycle, from liability and deadline planning to damages and net recovery.
Estimate non-economic damages with multiplier and per diem models.
Model whiplash, sprain, and strain claims with documentation-aware assumptions.
Estimate an injury filing deadline by state and highlight timing risks.
Estimate shared fault and see how negligence rules affect recovery.
Estimate net recovery after attorney fees, costs, liens, and reductions.
Estimate missed income, future earning loss, benefits loss, and after-tax wage recovery planning.
Project rehab, therapy, medication, surgery, equipment, and home-care costs for settlement planning.
Estimate support loss, funeral costs, medical bills, and relationship-based wrongful-death damages.
Create an editable personal-injury demand letter draft with damages, evidence, and settlement language.
Build a tailored evidence checklist for records, photos, witnesses, wage proof, experts, and missing claim documents.
Model the gross-to-net waterfall and see your take-home range after fees, costs, and liens.
Build a HIPAA records request letter that writes itself as you fill in patient and provider details.
See minimum liability, UM/UIM, and PIP requirements by state — minimums are rarely enough for a serious injury.
See whether your state uses pure, modified, or contributory negligence — and the fault % that bars recovery.
Compare personal-injury filing deadlines across all 50 states and DC, then calculate your exact date.
Estimate loss-of-use reimbursement owed during repairs or a total-loss claim, plus the gap beyond your coverage caps.
Build a certified-mail spoliation letter that preserves the evidence your accident type depends on.
Compare your damages against the at-fault driver's limits and your own UM/UIM coverage to find the gap.
Estimate post-accident diminished value with the 17c floor and a market-based range, plus state availability notes.
Compare repair cost to actual cash value against the total-loss threshold to see if your car is likely totaled.
See typical settlement ranges by injury type as educational bands — ranges, not predictions.
Check which elements of an injury claim look present, partial, or missing — educational, not a verdict.
Draft a counteroffer letter comparing their offer to your documented damages, with anchor-high coaching.
Weigh settle-vs-trial factors for a qualitative lean and the case for each path — never a directive.
Move from calculator estimates into documentation, deeper guides, or the rest of the JusticeFinder tool library.
Continue Exploring
JusticeFinder is designed so every visit can turn into a concrete next step, whether that means opening a calculator, reading a guide, organizing records, or searching the library directly.
Read JusticeFinder elsewhere
TikTok, Instagram, and Threads — short-form legal explainers from the editorial team.